20th May 2006, 02:18 PM
To bring this to an end (at least for this case)
Glass on top of wall
http://www.bajr.org/graphics/picglass.jpg
wall further along:
http://www.bajr.org/graphics/picwall.jpg
so lets hear the end of it.
Mattock is indeed right that a well presented report it was too...
Photos, times, dates, reports cross referenced.. unfortunately the reality was not what was reported... which may of course be beacuse you were a new graduate, and did not know the full story. But now you do... so perhaps time to move on.
What exactly are you suggesting then.
Other people have made comments about sites as well... but they did not start by accusing BAJR of not taking reports seriously or
You have done nothing but claim that a site you reported was a serious breach.. when presented with evidence you have still maintained that it was so...
You are making a serious issue a personal issue - and are now inferring that somehow becasue I became a MIFA in February, this was linked to an event that took place over a year ago? Chill Mattock... you are walking a thin line
Another day another WSI?
Glass on top of wall
http://www.bajr.org/graphics/picglass.jpg
wall further along:
http://www.bajr.org/graphics/picwall.jpg
so lets hear the end of it.
Mattock is indeed right that a well presented report it was too...
Photos, times, dates, reports cross referenced.. unfortunately the reality was not what was reported... which may of course be beacuse you were a new graduate, and did not know the full story. But now you do... so perhaps time to move on.
Quote:quote:Not wishing to suggest a coverup.... but maybe it is just concidence, with Mr hosty recently applying for a MIFA, and subject of complaint being an RAO.....
What exactly are you suggesting then.
Other people have made comments about sites as well... but they did not start by accusing BAJR of not taking reports seriously or
Quote:quote: The work was completed by an RAO. Photos were taken, and case duely reported. However, it is seems that these breaches were/are not serious enough for action to be taken. It seems that health/safety/welfare of staff does not warrent protection!!
You have done nothing but claim that a site you reported was a serious breach.. when presented with evidence you have still maintained that it was so...
You are making a serious issue a personal issue - and are now inferring that somehow becasue I became a MIFA in February, this was linked to an event that took place over a year ago? Chill Mattock... you are walking a thin line
Another day another WSI?