31st May 2006, 06:19 PM
Having read the current thread, and those on britarch, it seems that an individual/organisation is being victimised/slandered.
What is wrong with anyone establishing courses? If they are accredited then so much the better... Howvever, everyone has to start somewhare.
I remember, not to long ago a thread on the BAJR fourm which resulted in a certain archaeological firm (not RAO registered) threatening legal action..... BAJR backed down.... despite the fact that legal action would cost 10 of thousands.... Now, with the shoes on the other foot BAJR is making derogriatory comments about an individual/org knowing full well that they cannot afford to sue....
So question to be asked? Is BAJR trying to keep out new comers? Not willing to stand up against est. organisations??
He is after all a member of the IFA, if there is any problem let them decide... BAJR, Britarch, dicsussion groups are not there to convict people........ Go through the proper process please. If you do not, how can anyone have faith in our organisation??
Come on, be FAIR
What is wrong with anyone establishing courses? If they are accredited then so much the better... Howvever, everyone has to start somewhare.
I remember, not to long ago a thread on the BAJR fourm which resulted in a certain archaeological firm (not RAO registered) threatening legal action..... BAJR backed down.... despite the fact that legal action would cost 10 of thousands.... Now, with the shoes on the other foot BAJR is making derogriatory comments about an individual/org knowing full well that they cannot afford to sue....
So question to be asked? Is BAJR trying to keep out new comers? Not willing to stand up against est. organisations??
He is after all a member of the IFA, if there is any problem let them decide... BAJR, Britarch, dicsussion groups are not there to convict people........ Go through the proper process please. If you do not, how can anyone have faith in our organisation??
Come on, be FAIR