2nd June 2006, 09:40 AM
So the IFA are reassured that it wont happen again......wow .....and that is that ?????
Game Over?
Just a slip of the old paperwork, as has already been stated in previous posts
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ne...storyid=77
So thats it???????????????????
No further questions, No investigation or even a mention , of "has it ever happened before since 2004" or even whether the firm is managing to maintain the IFA RAO Standards (listed accidently on their paperwork)?
Interesting, as well, that according to the IFA Website they reapplied in 2005 as an RAO, but appear to have been refused.
Hmmmmm, well same old story then from the IFA.....or so it would appear from their website statement.....RAO being an important part of the IFA, a measure of the IFA quality ..... but, sadly, they (The IFA) do not appear to want to protect their own interest .... no policing of their own RAO logo and standards...... it would appear that they are all bluster and no teeth!..grrrr grrrr
A bit annoying, perhaps, for all those IFA RAO firms who have maintained and continue to maintain the high IFA RAO Standards and are able to use the RAO Logo as a measure of their own quality.
Question -
If companies put in their WSI's that they will carry out work to IFA RAO Standards.. what happens if they dont do this work correctly ?.....Can the IFA become involved even if they are not an IFA RAO?
Who actually will decide if the work meets the IFA Standard if a complaint is made?
Game Over?
Just a slip of the old paperwork, as has already been stated in previous posts
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ne...storyid=77
So thats it???????????????????
No further questions, No investigation or even a mention , of "has it ever happened before since 2004" or even whether the firm is managing to maintain the IFA RAO Standards (listed accidently on their paperwork)?
Interesting, as well, that according to the IFA Website they reapplied in 2005 as an RAO, but appear to have been refused.
Hmmmmm, well same old story then from the IFA.....or so it would appear from their website statement.....RAO being an important part of the IFA, a measure of the IFA quality ..... but, sadly, they (The IFA) do not appear to want to protect their own interest .... no policing of their own RAO logo and standards...... it would appear that they are all bluster and no teeth!..grrrr grrrr
A bit annoying, perhaps, for all those IFA RAO firms who have maintained and continue to maintain the high IFA RAO Standards and are able to use the RAO Logo as a measure of their own quality.
Question -
If companies put in their WSI's that they will carry out work to IFA RAO Standards.. what happens if they dont do this work correctly ?.....Can the IFA become involved even if they are not an IFA RAO?
Who actually will decide if the work meets the IFA Standard if a complaint is made?