2nd June 2006, 11:47 AM
What more do you want? An unauthorised use of the logo was reported to the IFA and the matter was dealt with. The infringement and outcome, together with the identity of the firm concerned, has been placed in the public domain. This seems to be a swifter piece of action than most other professional instututes! Hardly a case of toothless blutser, I would have thought.
If a firm is not an RAO but are contracted to work to those standards then it is not the concern of the IFA, but is a planning and/or contractual matter between the firm and the empoyer (via his consultant if appopinted) and the curator, as applicable.
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.
If a firm is not an RAO but are contracted to work to those standards then it is not the concern of the IFA, but is a planning and/or contractual matter between the firm and the empoyer (via his consultant if appopinted) and the curator, as applicable.
We owe the dead nothing but the truth.