20th June 2006, 02:23 PM
As the person who started this whole thread off, i have to agree with troll. The train of thought was started as a non specific way of questioning how the policy possibly implimented by the contractors of a specific unit affected its diggers.
It was never sugguested that there is any place onsite for drugs!
I have been digging for 4 years and have only come across one instance where drugs were consumed on site and i think some of the claims made by trowelhead are greatly exagerated and definatly give the wrong impression.
Sure lots of us are recreational drug users but that is in no way limitied to archaeology, and is not carried out on site.
It was never sugguested that there is any place onsite for drugs!
I have been digging for 4 years and have only come across one instance where drugs were consumed on site and i think some of the claims made by trowelhead are greatly exagerated and definatly give the wrong impression.
Sure lots of us are recreational drug users but that is in no way limitied to archaeology, and is not carried out on site.