21st June 2006, 10:29 AM
Well said Troll !
HOORAY !!!!!!!!!
This has been my point through out this thread. A unit has made use of the IFA RAO Logo when they are not entitled to do so and by doing so, would appear to have potentially debased the value of the RAO Status.
So, as you say Troll, RAO Units should not be happy with this limp slap on the writs by the IFA - "we are reassured that it wont happen again" - its too late IFA , it has happened and you (IFA) have no idea how long it has been going on for either !!!!!!!!!!
Do the WSI's from this unit or letters to their Clients also suggest that they are (maybe) still an IFA RAO and are able to work to those RAO Standards?[xx(]
HOORAY !!!!!!!!!
This has been my point through out this thread. A unit has made use of the IFA RAO Logo when they are not entitled to do so and by doing so, would appear to have potentially debased the value of the RAO Status.
So, as you say Troll, RAO Units should not be happy with this limp slap on the writs by the IFA - "we are reassured that it wont happen again" - its too late IFA , it has happened and you (IFA) have no idea how long it has been going on for either !!!!!!!!!!
Do the WSI's from this unit or letters to their Clients also suggest that they are (maybe) still an IFA RAO and are able to work to those RAO Standards?[xx(]