21st June 2006, 12:50 PM
All I say is appropriate action was taken... the other comments about misuse of the IFA RAOmark do not reflect my findings. In the main ( and I use the word carefully) the letterheads have been used - with instruction to blank out the mark... (better than scrapping lots of paper) in some cases .. for whatever reason, this did not happen. It won't happen again, and does not seem to have been used for commercial gain. The IFA response was quick and proportinal..
should be enough I hope.
Another day another WSI?
should be enough I hope.
Another day another WSI?