21st July 2006, 07:06 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by BAJR HostEvidently.
There is no more need for arguement.. I am going
I presume when you are swinging your machine David youâll bear in mind that BAJR guidance is âto make sure none of your work ends up straying even close to a Scheduled Ancient Monumentâ and to "put a good 50 metre buffer round it". Always assuming you think the archaeological landscape of this mile long monument extends only for a derisory 50 metres (well Tarmac does, and a particular set of less than heritage-sensitive detectorists do, so it hardly matters that absolutely no-one else does I suppose).
I believe that last year Atkins Heritage (commissioned by English Heritage and the Thornborough Henges Consultation Group) tentatively presented to the public an 8 square mile âexclusion zoneâ relating to various activities seen as threatening to the archaeology. I doubt that will happen but it makes you think, doesnât it? Who knows what will be decided in the end, but whatever it is, having used a detector anywhere in the close vicinity will not be exactly seen as a badge of honour, thatâs for absolute certain. The sad thing is that in this issue you are likely to be at variance with a lot of sensible detectorists. "Liaison without brakes" eh?