8th September 2006, 08:26 PM
What's far worse is having to put "the project was managed by so-and-so" when so-and-so did precisely zip and didn't even manage to make a site visit. And the only thing of note done when "editing" the report was to add their name in the acknowledgements.
Realistically - what would you like to see? I'm not being sarcastic here, btw. Been on both sides - named as "worked on site" or whatever, and written the acknowledgments. You can't detail every person's individual contribution to the site, so what do you put? Surely, like it or not, you're going to end up with "The following people assisted with the fieldwork" or whatever the house style is.
You can always tell a Brummie... but you can't tell him much
Realistically - what would you like to see? I'm not being sarcastic here, btw. Been on both sides - named as "worked on site" or whatever, and written the acknowledgments. You can't detail every person's individual contribution to the site, so what do you put? Surely, like it or not, you're going to end up with "The following people assisted with the fieldwork" or whatever the house style is.
You can always tell a Brummie... but you can't tell him much