20th September 2006, 03:56 PM
Quote:quote:The half you allude to was of no real additional benefit to this thread ..Hmmm. Well, obviously in the mind of its author it was, since it offered a possible explanation of the sudden shift of opinion after a long period of relative stability even though the numbers of votes was increasing. And it is not my fault that conditions here are such that expressing a simple and logical thought may "cause disruption". Could you not deal with the people causing that disruption if and when it happens rather than arbitrarily censoring in mid sentence an attempt to discuss an archaeological matter on an archaeological forum?
In any case the tampering with this BAJR poll (to suggest that the majority of archaeologists here are against Article 3 of Valetta) suggests that somebody is out to 'disrupt' this Forum regardless. Please deal with them, and not those that are trying to make a sensible contribution here.
Paul Barford