19th October 2006, 02:04 PM
thanks for your view point kelly.
i did expect to get the YES answer from archaeologists themselves, but does anyone agree with the view that archaeology is perhaps non-essential, that there are overriding concerns in our modern world which are more essential? Do other areas of research make archaeology a redundent subject and with the wealth of information we have already do we really need to know and find more?
i did expect to get the YES answer from archaeologists themselves, but does anyone agree with the view that archaeology is perhaps non-essential, that there are overriding concerns in our modern world which are more essential? Do other areas of research make archaeology a redundent subject and with the wealth of information we have already do we really need to know and find more?