15th November 2006, 07:53 AM
Isn't there a valid arguement however that the 'good' that archaeology does or could do as an industry offsets the relatively small carbon credit on its account? I mean would anyone seriously suggest that the carbon footprint of an ambulance service is offset against its effiency at arriving quickly on the scene, administering first aid or more serious care to the patient and, if required, removing the injured to a place of safety or further treatment.?
OK I know, define what is meant by the term 'good'.....
OK I know, define what is meant by the term 'good'.....