15th December 2006, 10:10 AM
Drpeterwardle said
âWork by stat. undertakers is how ever very different. It is however very far from a complete stitch up.â
Most pipelines bar some local schemes have a right of access in their legislation which basically disembowels the landowner and in the melee places archaeology at the bottom of the landowners concerns. Although presented in a compensatory way in all cases the archaeologists are employed by the developer and the archaeologists being quite contemptuous of landowners and the ownership of archaeology, are all too happy to play along. I would suggest that this is a total stitch up and leads to the types of sycophantic archaeology that we have occurring on the national pipeline schemes. I think all landowners have every right to be very contemptuous of archaeologists as a result
Hows this for a model. Landowner appoints their own archaeologist to undertake the work then charges the developer for copyright to use the archaeology in their planning application and takes a 100% commission for the loss of Their potential archaeology-the 100% of the costs of undertaking the archaeology.
Thereâs this going on for example
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1374032006
this is an old example
http://www.revolt.co.uk/news90.html
hosty in what way are you involved in two what?
âWork by stat. undertakers is how ever very different. It is however very far from a complete stitch up.â
Most pipelines bar some local schemes have a right of access in their legislation which basically disembowels the landowner and in the melee places archaeology at the bottom of the landowners concerns. Although presented in a compensatory way in all cases the archaeologists are employed by the developer and the archaeologists being quite contemptuous of landowners and the ownership of archaeology, are all too happy to play along. I would suggest that this is a total stitch up and leads to the types of sycophantic archaeology that we have occurring on the national pipeline schemes. I think all landowners have every right to be very contemptuous of archaeologists as a result
Hows this for a model. Landowner appoints their own archaeologist to undertake the work then charges the developer for copyright to use the archaeology in their planning application and takes a 100% commission for the loss of Their potential archaeology-the 100% of the costs of undertaking the archaeology.
Thereâs this going on for example
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1374032006
this is an old example
http://www.revolt.co.uk/news90.html
hosty in what way are you involved in two what?