16th December 2006, 07:29 PM
David,
Sorry
"The AUO says You must not post anything that is.... defamatory,
Do Not post content that contains allegations about individuals or
companies"
I thought I was just inside this as I was commenting about how I am currently affected by the work of X.
My reference to X as well as Z and W relates to an on going saga in the village A where I live and was featured on the BBC Watchdog programme last week and has been features in news TV programmes newspapers etc. It also related to none arhaeology matters.
The Archaeology done by M for Z was done to a very high standard by the way.
I have to say I forgot about X treatment of the archaeology and if it has been done correctly. I will be checking with B on Monday and the leader of the LPA to find out why an EIA (according to the project engineer) was not carried out.
And I certainly wont mention the work by N in the area.
It has to be recongnised that there are few players involved in pipelines and so most examples are going to be easily recognisable.
However there is a debate to had about how archaeology and pipelines is undertaken. To my mind pre-permission the amount of work required is excessive.
Thus the debate is going to have to be very generic and not about isolated examples.
Peter
A apologies again if I did break the AUP
Sorry
"The AUO says You must not post anything that is.... defamatory,
Do Not post content that contains allegations about individuals or
companies"
I thought I was just inside this as I was commenting about how I am currently affected by the work of X.
My reference to X as well as Z and W relates to an on going saga in the village A where I live and was featured on the BBC Watchdog programme last week and has been features in news TV programmes newspapers etc. It also related to none arhaeology matters.
The Archaeology done by M for Z was done to a very high standard by the way.
I have to say I forgot about X treatment of the archaeology and if it has been done correctly. I will be checking with B on Monday and the leader of the LPA to find out why an EIA (according to the project engineer) was not carried out.
And I certainly wont mention the work by N in the area.
It has to be recongnised that there are few players involved in pipelines and so most examples are going to be easily recognisable.
However there is a debate to had about how archaeology and pipelines is undertaken. To my mind pre-permission the amount of work required is excessive.
Thus the debate is going to have to be very generic and not about isolated examples.
Peter
A apologies again if I did break the AUP