1st January 2007, 03:15 PM
I think that RAO status in general was quickly watered down by Network who chose to use the IFA RAO on their letterheads when their membership had "lapsed" by over two years when they were busted.The (robust?) IFA response of "we have been assured that this wont happen again" was somewhat pathetic, missed an enormous point and was altogether un-surprising.A quick natter over tea and bickies seems to be the order of the day and a limp assurance to the IFA is obviously enough to right the boat again.Hows about this......If the IFA provides an organisation with the RAO status and said organisation takes the urine...should we not be advising clients to take the IFA to court?
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)