4th January 2007, 03:54 PM
I would love to see the Curators marking out of 10... every piece of work... 
) (we do secretly already!!) and this gives an 'accurate' picture of who is doing what and how well.
I suspect that monitoring does not cost, as we are paid to do it by our council... tough I would guess that another problem comes when a curator/DC has to somehow know everything and everything... (so one person might notice a 'bad' building record while another might not..or one might see through the use of an innapropriate piece of geophysic kit while another (myself included) would not know ......) As Uo1 says, we need a monitoring guide that can monitor those that monitor that which the monitor has been unable to monitor becasue the monitoring is being monitored by a monitor that themselves should be monitored by a monitor..
Positive monitoring is definately a better way... as you say...
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
) (we do secretly already!!) and this gives an 'accurate' picture of who is doing what and how well.I suspect that monitoring does not cost, as we are paid to do it by our council... tough I would guess that another problem comes when a curator/DC has to somehow know everything and everything... (so one person might notice a 'bad' building record while another might not..or one might see through the use of an innapropriate piece of geophysic kit while another (myself included) would not know ......) As Uo1 says, we need a monitoring guide that can monitor those that monitor that which the monitor has been unable to monitor becasue the monitoring is being monitored by a monitor that themselves should be monitored by a monitor..
Positive monitoring is definately a better way... as you say...
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu