12th January 2007, 02:50 PM
5.7 An archaeologist shall have due regard to the rights of individuals who wish to join or belong to a trade union, professional or trade association
Are these rights different from legal rights, yet again was a law broken? And was it reported? did the IFA report it to the authorities.
1.1 An archaeologist shall conduct himself or herself in a manner which will not bring archaeology or the Institute into disrepute
In the whose eye
1.12 An archaeologist has a duty to ensure that this Code is observed throughout the membership of the Institute, and also to encourage its adoption by others (see note on Rule 1.12).
So he didnât encourage people to join- hardly rotten to the bone. I have just told the milkman that he should join- so you cant get me
Note (on Rule 1.12):
From time to time the Institute receives formal or informal complaints about members and allegations of breaches of its by-laws. An archaeologistâs duty to ensure that the Code of conduct is observed includes providing information in response to a request from the Chair or a Vice Chair, and/or giving evidence to such panels and hearings as may be established for the purposes of investigating an alleged breach of the Instituteâs by-laws. This requirement is without prejudice to the provisions of Rule 1.10 regarding confidential information.
this is positively messy
Why is it a Note to 1.12- it seems unconnected. So did he not encourage others and then refused to tell the consultant from CgMs, or was it an academic, that he hadnât encouraged others
Golly 1.10 got its own note too
1.10 An archaeologist shall not reveal confidential information unless required by law; nor use confidential or privileged information to his/her own advantage or that of a third person.
Note:
The archaeologist should also exercise care to prevent employees, colleagues, associates and helpers from revealing or using confidential information in these ways. Confidential information means information gained in the course of the project which the employer or client has for the time being requested be held inviolate, or the disclosure of which would be potentially embarrassing or detrimental to the employer or client. Information ceases to be confidential when the employer or client so indicates, or when such information becomes publicly known. Where specifically archaeological information is involved, it is however the responsibility of the archaeologist to inform the employer or client of any conflict with his/her own responsibilities under Principle 4 of the Code (dissemination of archaeological information) and to seek to minimise or remove any such conflict.
I cant work out if he was done for keeping his trap shut or for opening his trap
"Principle 4" is there no end to it
Are these rights different from legal rights, yet again was a law broken? And was it reported? did the IFA report it to the authorities.
1.1 An archaeologist shall conduct himself or herself in a manner which will not bring archaeology or the Institute into disrepute
In the whose eye
1.12 An archaeologist has a duty to ensure that this Code is observed throughout the membership of the Institute, and also to encourage its adoption by others (see note on Rule 1.12).
So he didnât encourage people to join- hardly rotten to the bone. I have just told the milkman that he should join- so you cant get me
Note (on Rule 1.12):
From time to time the Institute receives formal or informal complaints about members and allegations of breaches of its by-laws. An archaeologistâs duty to ensure that the Code of conduct is observed includes providing information in response to a request from the Chair or a Vice Chair, and/or giving evidence to such panels and hearings as may be established for the purposes of investigating an alleged breach of the Instituteâs by-laws. This requirement is without prejudice to the provisions of Rule 1.10 regarding confidential information.
this is positively messy
Why is it a Note to 1.12- it seems unconnected. So did he not encourage others and then refused to tell the consultant from CgMs, or was it an academic, that he hadnât encouraged others
Golly 1.10 got its own note too
1.10 An archaeologist shall not reveal confidential information unless required by law; nor use confidential or privileged information to his/her own advantage or that of a third person.
Note:
The archaeologist should also exercise care to prevent employees, colleagues, associates and helpers from revealing or using confidential information in these ways. Confidential information means information gained in the course of the project which the employer or client has for the time being requested be held inviolate, or the disclosure of which would be potentially embarrassing or detrimental to the employer or client. Information ceases to be confidential when the employer or client so indicates, or when such information becomes publicly known. Where specifically archaeological information is involved, it is however the responsibility of the archaeologist to inform the employer or client of any conflict with his/her own responsibilities under Principle 4 of the Code (dissemination of archaeological information) and to seek to minimise or remove any such conflict.
I cant work out if he was done for keeping his trap shut or for opening his trap
"Principle 4" is there no end to it