15th January 2007, 07:21 PM
Sir-with respect, if we are to move on at all, discussion is surely the modus operandi. I have no intention of mentioning either the (removed) individual or the organisation-I simply suggest that;
1. The IFA have been consistantly instrumental in devaluing the work of professional archaeologists since their birth and to suggest that after years of this-one statement that mirrors what everyone else has been saying repeatedly does not in my book balance the scales and
2. The removal of two-yes count them two- entities in all these years of the IFA existance is not an assurance that standards and professionalism are being taken seriously.:face-huh:
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
1. The IFA have been consistantly instrumental in devaluing the work of professional archaeologists since their birth and to suggest that after years of this-one statement that mirrors what everyone else has been saying repeatedly does not in my book balance the scales and
2. The removal of two-yes count them two- entities in all these years of the IFA existance is not an assurance that standards and professionalism are being taken seriously.:face-huh:
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)