22nd January 2007, 04:41 PM
Unit of 1, you said âtraditional farm buildingâ- traditional -now thereâs a subject -the management of 8.5 and 13.1million - did you get a cut?
Traditional farm buildings are defined as those built in the local vernacular tradition before 1940 - so there is no 'subject' if I take your comments to mean that random buildings get money for nothing.
The figures refer to a period before I started work for my current employer. As to 'getting a cut' if you are implying that there may be bribery and corruption of myself involved then I treat your question with contempt - that is left to people much, much higher up the pecking order than I am! But if you are asking sensibly 'did the administrators gain any financial benefit from the work - no, their pay did not depend on this work being done - there may be a few contracting building recording archaeologists who got a 'cut' through the funding for building recording in advance of work - do you do building recording work for DEFRA grant schemes ever?
Traditional farm buildings are defined as those built in the local vernacular tradition before 1940 - so there is no 'subject' if I take your comments to mean that random buildings get money for nothing.
The figures refer to a period before I started work for my current employer. As to 'getting a cut' if you are implying that there may be bribery and corruption of myself involved then I treat your question with contempt - that is left to people much, much higher up the pecking order than I am! But if you are asking sensibly 'did the administrators gain any financial benefit from the work - no, their pay did not depend on this work being done - there may be a few contracting building recording archaeologists who got a 'cut' through the funding for building recording in advance of work - do you do building recording work for DEFRA grant schemes ever?