12th February 2007, 05:57 PM
I suppose what I'm trying to say is, has the paradigm shift not already happened and we are now in the classic situation of having to try and define what paradigm we're in now. Hodder knew what he was trying to show or explain and the shift in the late 70s/early 80s was actually rather well thought out, however the current situation has been born from a collapse of the old ideas leaving a vaccuum rather than a purposeful shift to a new position, with additional confusion stemming from the division between academic and commercial archaeology.
Please argue! :-D
Please argue! :-D