16th February 2007, 02:08 PM
Good day sir-hope your well.
I do of course accept that land ownership can be an issue and may have played a part here.To echo your sentiments, surely, a contingency should have been built in particularly as the monument could be seen as a largely"unknown quantity" if indeed, denial of access was an issue.As an aside, the "unknown" quality of the monument would surely have prompted a more comprehensive assessment by the curatorial staff-if anything, bolstering the argument for avoidence or the scheduling of the monument.
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
I do of course accept that land ownership can be an issue and may have played a part here.To echo your sentiments, surely, a contingency should have been built in particularly as the monument could be seen as a largely"unknown quantity" if indeed, denial of access was an issue.As an aside, the "unknown" quality of the monument would surely have prompted a more comprehensive assessment by the curatorial staff-if anything, bolstering the argument for avoidence or the scheduling of the monument.
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)