24th February 2007, 08:40 PM
Below is an edited version of Unit of 1
"I know of a recent example of dba where my ordnance survey map had Anglo-Saxon Cemetery written on it that the consultant missed.
They also failed to notice some big landscape features.
That particular scheme went through four different units, six if you include the geophysics and the consultants archaeologists (seven- I forgot the curators).
They had different units doing the fieldwalking (upset the locals) evaluations (in the wrong place) and the excavations. And as for the disparate bits of paper more paper maze than trail. I would challenge anybody to find them let alone put them together."
Have deciphered Unitof1 messages there are some points to consider such as how PPG 16 has evolved and if in fact this is acceptable
As for the notion of telling a client to wait and see if a condition is imposed. This is unethical if a site is present or it is a very large area or there is other good reason to believe an important site exists.
I for one cannot be bothered answering or editing this vitriol
Peter
"I know of a recent example of dba where my ordnance survey map had Anglo-Saxon Cemetery written on it that the consultant missed.
They also failed to notice some big landscape features.
That particular scheme went through four different units, six if you include the geophysics and the consultants archaeologists (seven- I forgot the curators).
They had different units doing the fieldwalking (upset the locals) evaluations (in the wrong place) and the excavations. And as for the disparate bits of paper more paper maze than trail. I would challenge anybody to find them let alone put them together."
Have deciphered Unitof1 messages there are some points to consider such as how PPG 16 has evolved and if in fact this is acceptable
As for the notion of telling a client to wait and see if a condition is imposed. This is unethical if a site is present or it is a very large area or there is other good reason to believe an important site exists.
I for one cannot be bothered answering or editing this vitriol
Peter