27th February 2007, 11:49 AM
salam alicombe Troll we were just breaking through the clouds
Hosty Please get it out of your mind that I go around âknowingâ where there is archaeology and advise developers to go ahead and develop by me being able to pull wool over somebodyâs eyes within some contract. See it rather as 1 in 40 developments get a condition- therefore without further research a developer has a 1 in 40 likelihood of a condition. All I am doing is giving out that statistic to which we can add that if they do get a condition the likelihood is that it will be a watching brief. âdeveloper goes off puts the application in turns out my advice was âtrueâ tells one or two other developers I get more phone calls.-with a few more finesses it is called PR- Wheres the contract, your dbas and all the rest of what are? PoW WSIs I presume are commissioned and contracted thats what the codes are directed at-âshall not enter into contractualâ. Archaeologists exist before the contract or do they (is that an important point) .
Now if I was asked to enter into doing a dba 1man is suggesting that I cant because if I will ramp up the archaeology to be done (I dont think this is true because I presumably dont want the client to go off and find someone else and as you interestingly say you will spot it or would you be impressed if I got the full gold plate off the job) Iman is very much the developer world which is likely to go to excavation, the likely place troll is sitting without a why we here. In Mr mans world the dba is not done by the archaeologist at the pointy end âperiod. In 1mans world (engineering-solution to everything = build) he has 11 âarchaeologistsâ and their job is to go to public inquires- no trowel required. And little by little the concept of an archaeologist is being sliced into ever smaller disparate pieces, pieces- apparently all in conflicts of interest- so example we are now quite happily advertise for post ex-teams and allow post ex go to tender. So troll paper trail isnt allowed talking to each other as it might have some unfair commercial interest conflict going on or they are being handed documents which were not really intended for them.
I think consultants really like trenches as a baseline, I think that they like making out that they are really expensive. The more trenches that they can show the client that donât have to be done the more they can justify the benefits they are making for their clients- how else do they workout their charges.
Hosty I suspect that for trenches to do the finding on their own somewhere around 20% coverage, might be more, is required. I think that archaeologists have a lot more work to do on this, particularly feed back in the field. You see a lot of grid patterns which were presumably agreed by the system and then the poor unfortunate goes out and does them. What I would like to see are the people in the field plying some theories and reacting to the outcomes of their observations-topographic, geomorphological, experience, one last one for luck . In as much as gephiz has been mentioned thereâs space for augur surveys, micromorph and lidar is getting interesting. it all should be seen a s aid for trenching
Hosty Please get it out of your mind that I go around âknowingâ where there is archaeology and advise developers to go ahead and develop by me being able to pull wool over somebodyâs eyes within some contract. See it rather as 1 in 40 developments get a condition- therefore without further research a developer has a 1 in 40 likelihood of a condition. All I am doing is giving out that statistic to which we can add that if they do get a condition the likelihood is that it will be a watching brief. âdeveloper goes off puts the application in turns out my advice was âtrueâ tells one or two other developers I get more phone calls.-with a few more finesses it is called PR- Wheres the contract, your dbas and all the rest of what are? PoW WSIs I presume are commissioned and contracted thats what the codes are directed at-âshall not enter into contractualâ. Archaeologists exist before the contract or do they (is that an important point) .
Now if I was asked to enter into doing a dba 1man is suggesting that I cant because if I will ramp up the archaeology to be done (I dont think this is true because I presumably dont want the client to go off and find someone else and as you interestingly say you will spot it or would you be impressed if I got the full gold plate off the job) Iman is very much the developer world which is likely to go to excavation, the likely place troll is sitting without a why we here. In Mr mans world the dba is not done by the archaeologist at the pointy end âperiod. In 1mans world (engineering-solution to everything = build) he has 11 âarchaeologistsâ and their job is to go to public inquires- no trowel required. And little by little the concept of an archaeologist is being sliced into ever smaller disparate pieces, pieces- apparently all in conflicts of interest- so example we are now quite happily advertise for post ex-teams and allow post ex go to tender. So troll paper trail isnt allowed talking to each other as it might have some unfair commercial interest conflict going on or they are being handed documents which were not really intended for them.
I think consultants really like trenches as a baseline, I think that they like making out that they are really expensive. The more trenches that they can show the client that donât have to be done the more they can justify the benefits they are making for their clients- how else do they workout their charges.
Hosty I suspect that for trenches to do the finding on their own somewhere around 20% coverage, might be more, is required. I think that archaeologists have a lot more work to do on this, particularly feed back in the field. You see a lot of grid patterns which were presumably agreed by the system and then the poor unfortunate goes out and does them. What I would like to see are the people in the field plying some theories and reacting to the outcomes of their observations-topographic, geomorphological, experience, one last one for luck . In as much as gephiz has been mentioned thereâs space for augur surveys, micromorph and lidar is getting interesting. it all should be seen a s aid for trenching