9th March 2007, 12:09 PM
Where in the white paper does it suggest that the principles of PPG16 are going to be removed Peter? I'm not sure we're talking about the same PPG16 either as in practice it doesn't 'protect' the majority of archaeological sites, but rather facilitates their destruction albeit through controlled excavation and 'replacement by record'.
Grade II buildings are already protected from demolition as are buildings in conservation areas - the proposals in the white paper strengthen this protection and also set out ways in which 'local list' (not grade II) buildings can be similarly protected.
See CKs post above.
Grade II buildings are already protected from demolition as are buildings in conservation areas - the proposals in the white paper strengthen this protection and also set out ways in which 'local list' (not grade II) buildings can be similarly protected.
See CKs post above.