15th March 2007, 09:06 PM
With respect sir-no its not.Its been said that the White paper could represent the first "protective" legislation we have seen in 30 years.The IFA know damned well that non policing of their standards has led to a free-for all.This paper could have been used as a launch-pad to finally do something about the pathetic standards allowed to slip the net by curatorial staff.The IFA have chosen to do nothing about this over the past 14 years and chose to ommit this issue when representations were made to the steering committee.I think this is highly relevent. As an aside, I`m not interested in "personal satisfaction"-a single-celled amoeba could see the glaring chasm between writing standards and then standing aside/remaining silent as they are flagrantly flouted as standing operational procedure nationwide (with some exceptions).:face-huh:
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)