3rd April 2007, 10:02 AM
Interesting to see this particularly within the wider context of historic environment reform, and whether this is a workable idea (certainly welcome the proactive approach) with regard to local authority and key services important to political leaders, would it not confirm the position of archaeological contract services as not significant enough politically, hence why in this instance it appears a private sector partner is sought to enable the said unit 'greater commercial and operational freedom?'
nil desperandum
nil desperandum