6th June 2007, 10:38 AM
I am confused.
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ne...storyid=45
says;
"For the registration year 2006-7 onwards, Registered Archaeological Organisations must abide by the IFAâs present recommended minimum salaries."
http://www.bajr.org/BAJRForum/topic.asp?...hTerms=pay
says
"IFA Registered Organisation must comply with these recommendations, and the amendment to principle 5 of the Code of conduct, which was agreed at the October AGM, also now expects all IFA members to give reasonable consideration to any IFA recommended pay minima and conditions of employment."
The document David quotes
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ic..._notes.pdf
does not clearly say that the pay minima are complusory.
So Yes or NO are the IFA "recommended minimums" just that or are they complusory.
As I keep on saying clarity and precision are needed as these thing effect peoples contrats and terms of employment and if RAOs are abiding by the IFA codes of conduct. All legal matters
Peter Wardle
(I dont want to start a debate about this when we shold be discussing the SCAUM declaration).
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ne...storyid=45
says;
"For the registration year 2006-7 onwards, Registered Archaeological Organisations must abide by the IFAâs present recommended minimum salaries."
http://www.bajr.org/BAJRForum/topic.asp?...hTerms=pay
says
"IFA Registered Organisation must comply with these recommendations, and the amendment to principle 5 of the Code of conduct, which was agreed at the October AGM, also now expects all IFA members to give reasonable consideration to any IFA recommended pay minima and conditions of employment."
The document David quotes
http://www.archaeologists.net/modules/ic..._notes.pdf
does not clearly say that the pay minima are complusory.
So Yes or NO are the IFA "recommended minimums" just that or are they complusory.
As I keep on saying clarity and precision are needed as these thing effect peoples contrats and terms of employment and if RAOs are abiding by the IFA codes of conduct. All legal matters
Peter Wardle
(I dont want to start a debate about this when we shold be discussing the SCAUM declaration).