5th July 2007, 04:01 PM
Staggering. This oaf deserves a custodial sentence. He only got caught because of a tip-off, I'm not sure if that's a little worrying.
Interesting ethical dilemma for his architects, who had infomed him that he required planning, LBC and buidling regs consents (none of which did he trouble the authorities with). No doubt the architects were not engaged for the tender or construction phases, but they probably knew what he was doing or intended to do. Should they have betrayed their client's confidence and informed the authorities? I believe they should.
You don't know what you've got till it's gone.
Interesting ethical dilemma for his architects, who had infomed him that he required planning, LBC and buidling regs consents (none of which did he trouble the authorities with). No doubt the architects were not engaged for the tender or construction phases, but they probably knew what he was doing or intended to do. Should they have betrayed their client's confidence and informed the authorities? I believe they should.
You don't know what you've got till it's gone.