30th April 2008, 12:10 AM
[quote]Originally posted by trowelhead
To play a good game and not just talk it.. actions speak louder than words!
Exactly right.
I'd like to feel the IFA actually has some relevance to me as a memeber of the lower eschelons. I get the feeling (probably incorrecty) that its a big boys club.
While training bursaries are more than welcome I get annoyed by the little things.
Having a list of people to vote for in elections without really knowing who they really are.
And the general waste of receiving guidelines in the post on Maritime Archaeology & Heritage Manangement. I'm a superviser (still a digger at heart!) and have absolutely no interest or involvement in these areas, so why bother sending them to me? To me it smacks of an organisation that hasn't thought things through properly.
And whilst it's nice to get all fields in Heritage integrated, why not sort out the ones you've got already rather than adding more to the general mess?
To play a good game and not just talk it.. actions speak louder than words!
Exactly right.
I'd like to feel the IFA actually has some relevance to me as a memeber of the lower eschelons. I get the feeling (probably incorrecty) that its a big boys club.
While training bursaries are more than welcome I get annoyed by the little things.
Having a list of people to vote for in elections without really knowing who they really are.
And the general waste of receiving guidelines in the post on Maritime Archaeology & Heritage Manangement. I'm a superviser (still a digger at heart!) and have absolutely no interest or involvement in these areas, so why bother sending them to me? To me it smacks of an organisation that hasn't thought things through properly.
And whilst it's nice to get all fields in Heritage integrated, why not sort out the ones you've got already rather than adding more to the general mess?