6th December 2007, 12:43 PM
I think building a stock of reports is very important, but to clarify my earlier response I am not so worried about the author's name being on the cover as long as it is clearly identifiable somewhere. I think it is only right, though, that the name is used in the reference, rather than the company.
Perhaps managers who insist that their staff write anonymous reports under the company name might like to do the same when they produce synthetic reports based on staff labours in journals. Not seen one yet.
Perhaps managers who insist that their staff write anonymous reports under the company name might like to do the same when they produce synthetic reports based on staff labours in journals. Not seen one yet.