11th December 2007, 04:24 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by Sith
This is all very interesting. I don't think that I have ever worked in an organisation where the author was credited on the cover of site reports.
I've never worked in an organisation where the author wasn't credited on the cover (or fly sheet) [:p]
For site reports (not EIAs) I favour crediting a principal author/editor - credit where credit's due. If you've written it you should be named.
Just read a DBA by a well known archaeological consultancy firm where the report was anonymous. It was very inadequate, full of plagiarism and sometimes clearly erroneous. How do I know how to avoid the individual with a bargepole if they apply for a job with my unit? [:0]