2nd May 2008, 11:06 AM
However, surely the recut is indeed a second cut feature, therefore has its own series of number associated with that cut...
so Cut [1] is filled with [2], [3] etc... a recut is a separate event, causing a new and distinct feature, even if on the same line, it is separated temporaly from the original cut, and several processes have taken place beforehand.. so this 'new' cut (say [7]) has its own sequence of primary fill, secondary fill etc... which are unrelated chronologically to the original primary fill, secondary fill... etc They are in essence separate features albeit in the same location...
Like a wall... you build a wall... you knock down wall and rebuild in the exact same place... this does not make it the same as the first wall.?
It is still a stratigraphic sequence
Fill [tertiary]
Fill [secondary]
Fill [Primary]
Recut
Fill [tertiary]
Fill [secondary]
Fill [Primary]
Original cut
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
so Cut [1] is filled with [2], [3] etc... a recut is a separate event, causing a new and distinct feature, even if on the same line, it is separated temporaly from the original cut, and several processes have taken place beforehand.. so this 'new' cut (say [7]) has its own sequence of primary fill, secondary fill etc... which are unrelated chronologically to the original primary fill, secondary fill... etc They are in essence separate features albeit in the same location...
Like a wall... you build a wall... you knock down wall and rebuild in the exact same place... this does not make it the same as the first wall.?
It is still a stratigraphic sequence
Fill [tertiary]
Fill [secondary]
Fill [Primary]
Recut
Fill [tertiary]
Fill [secondary]
Fill [Primary]
Original cut
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu