3rd May 2008, 09:34 AM
pesky geo-archaeologists! just trying to confuse things...
I think Sparky is right:
"there's needs to be an understood and widely used terminology" otherwise one persons primary fill is anothers secondary
But hold on... if you don't have a primary fill, how can you go straight to secondary... secondary to what? something that did not happen? Though I think I am grasping that geo-archs see the world differently... and they can have fills (or not) describing erosional or natural events as opposed to human events.
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
I think Sparky is right:
"there's needs to be an understood and widely used terminology" otherwise one persons primary fill is anothers secondary
But hold on... if you don't have a primary fill, how can you go straight to secondary... secondary to what? something that did not happen? Though I think I am grasping that geo-archs see the world differently... and they can have fills (or not) describing erosional or natural events as opposed to human events.
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu