16th January 2008, 10:12 PM
Dear Mr Host
I would like to say that I am not Mr <deleted> and have never been Mr <deleted> . Unfortunately I do know him from university where his only interest was in naturally fractured flint, namely potlids. A ridiculous, archaeologically pointless, interest indicative of his misplaced upper middle class contempt. Also he was and still is, suspiciously for a so-called archaeologist, the owner of a metal detector, something that all aspiring, left thinking archaeologists would never contemplate due to the ovid gene that has been bred into that lower class by the nationalists. The academic Julian Thomas was once heard to exclaim that Mr <deleted> only believes in discovery. He has not denied this and appears to have an argument based on âcontrol of the means of productionâ and âmortmainâ and is desperate to get the Arian heresy in there somewhere so as to join the argument to a singular peculiarity of Upper Palaeolithic cave art.
By nefarious means I have informed him of the abuses that have been levelled at his name on this site and have found him to be appalled at the anarchy and identity theft exhibited on the World Wide Web. It appears that he is sad that his family name never made it into the aristocracy and presumes that this is yet another nail. It has though resurrected a desire based on the union of Prince and Clint Eastwood to become The Man with No Name by changing his name by deed poll and by not filling in the new name so becoming Mr............ No doubt the Queen wont allow it (and a nonexistent God) although from his understanding of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 and amendments (is it not one of the most hammered Acts ever?) the reason why it might not be allowed is that it could be used for fraud even though those judgements appear to derive from the vagaries of case law originating in the lower courts. The same kangaroo courts from which the ritual abuse of the self-employed has evolved over the last century since the anti-Marxist invention of self-employment in America.
Anyway I am currently trying to fill in my self-assessment for 2006-2007. I have until the 31st this month to work out and stump up out of cash flow the tax on my ill-gotten gains to pay for all those Stonehenge derived civil serpent pension grabbers. I am wondering if my yearâs house keeping can be put down as experimental archaeology research. Similarly if I go into a museum in Italy can I claim my holida. sorry data collection as an expense? What do all you high rollers put down (get away with)? I am not sure why but it caught my attention in the Times (at my club) yesterday that a 68 year old Granny has been done for £2.5m benefit fraud based on taking the identities of recent emigrants from these shores. Living off the past. Its always ends in tears; one giro too many.
Unitof1s new e-mail is david.connolly@hotmail.co.uk
I would like to say that I am not Mr <deleted> and have never been Mr <deleted> . Unfortunately I do know him from university where his only interest was in naturally fractured flint, namely potlids. A ridiculous, archaeologically pointless, interest indicative of his misplaced upper middle class contempt. Also he was and still is, suspiciously for a so-called archaeologist, the owner of a metal detector, something that all aspiring, left thinking archaeologists would never contemplate due to the ovid gene that has been bred into that lower class by the nationalists. The academic Julian Thomas was once heard to exclaim that Mr <deleted> only believes in discovery. He has not denied this and appears to have an argument based on âcontrol of the means of productionâ and âmortmainâ and is desperate to get the Arian heresy in there somewhere so as to join the argument to a singular peculiarity of Upper Palaeolithic cave art.
By nefarious means I have informed him of the abuses that have been levelled at his name on this site and have found him to be appalled at the anarchy and identity theft exhibited on the World Wide Web. It appears that he is sad that his family name never made it into the aristocracy and presumes that this is yet another nail. It has though resurrected a desire based on the union of Prince and Clint Eastwood to become The Man with No Name by changing his name by deed poll and by not filling in the new name so becoming Mr............ No doubt the Queen wont allow it (and a nonexistent God) although from his understanding of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 and amendments (is it not one of the most hammered Acts ever?) the reason why it might not be allowed is that it could be used for fraud even though those judgements appear to derive from the vagaries of case law originating in the lower courts. The same kangaroo courts from which the ritual abuse of the self-employed has evolved over the last century since the anti-Marxist invention of self-employment in America.
Anyway I am currently trying to fill in my self-assessment for 2006-2007. I have until the 31st this month to work out and stump up out of cash flow the tax on my ill-gotten gains to pay for all those Stonehenge derived civil serpent pension grabbers. I am wondering if my yearâs house keeping can be put down as experimental archaeology research. Similarly if I go into a museum in Italy can I claim my holida. sorry data collection as an expense? What do all you high rollers put down (get away with)? I am not sure why but it caught my attention in the Times (at my club) yesterday that a 68 year old Granny has been done for £2.5m benefit fraud based on taking the identities of recent emigrants from these shores. Living off the past. Its always ends in tears; one giro too many.
Unitof1s new e-mail is david.connolly@hotmail.co.uk