7th February 2008, 03:06 PM
BAJR host. I did ask, hence the question mark. Gary, my curiosity is far from negative. But the context of this rare object as hinted at in the description on DFD may be of great importance to our understanding of the circumstances of it's deposition. There may be more to this than the object itself. Was it a casual loss or a deliberate deposition, as seems to be implied. Was it inserted into an earlier funerary monument as implied. Perhaps the finder had all necessary permissions, I don't mean to imply that they didn't but it doesn't read particularly well. Clarification please.