8th October 2009, 12:18 PM
Hmmmmm indeed, and ho ho :face-huh:
I note all the really weird comments come from mormons and druids in the states. My advice to them - less moonshine, get a passport and come over to look at British Archaeology in the flesh.
On a serious note, this looks like another fantastic addition to our understanding of the Stonehenge landscape, and is a tribute to the persistence and determination of those involved. Does Mike P-P have any idea how long after the Nat. Geo article a serious site report (or even interim) might appear in general circulation. Because I for one would love to read the detail with an open mind.
I note all the really weird comments come from mormons and druids in the states. My advice to them - less moonshine, get a passport and come over to look at British Archaeology in the flesh.
On a serious note, this looks like another fantastic addition to our understanding of the Stonehenge landscape, and is a tribute to the persistence and determination of those involved. Does Mike P-P have any idea how long after the Nat. Geo article a serious site report (or even interim) might appear in general circulation. Because I for one would love to read the detail with an open mind.