16th November 2009, 02:33 PM
That doesn't seem reasonable to me. Surely, if anything, it should be the opposite? That's sort of like saying that if you're a member of the IfA, then you shouldn't be able to vote on what IfA does because you might have a vested interest......
Council members are not there because they're RO staff members or not, they're there because the membership elected them. If you feel that they're not representing the membership, challenge them on it. And/or don't vote for them next time!
Council members are not there because they're RO staff members or not, they're there because the membership elected them. If you feel that they're not representing the membership, challenge them on it. And/or don't vote for them next time!