IfA campaign to require archaeological work to be undertaken by ROs

[YellowPete]

how would you cover the subject of a disabled person (as having equal opportunities in the pursuit of career, whilst yet their professional preformance may not be of a industry wide 'regarded' equal standard.

if this is the case then we are exploring the issues of one rule for one, and another for others.

sub standards, sub equivilence, SUB equalities

standards are great at creating parrameters, but i am still uncertain to our ability to manage and work with such parrameters.

we are still working on the basis of standards and non-standards are bad.

what are those standards, and by having standards does that make an industry more aware of what it does as a thinking industry, or does it fall into the area of causing fear of loosing house and home if you do not submit, or co-operate with externally derived standards.

we still need to address the issues of subjectivity and objectivity within the profession.

we have ample subjectivity, but we do not have evidentiary support to the diversity (white middle class) subjectivity.

objectivity is hard to come by in a recession

so which, or whose standards are we going to adhere to?

whose standards are we going to TOLERATE?

who do we not want around conducting these tolerated standards?


sounds sinister to me!