30th November 2009, 10:58 AM
I ran this through the Babelfish translation service :
and came up with this....
However returning to the concept of minima, I think that although responsive minima is a good idea in principle, i do not see it as a longterm solution in terms of retaining regular employment.
This situation probably always will be when it comes to field staff, but what of office or senior staff with greater responsibilities, liabilities and a need for stability? The field staff of today are the management of tomorrow so what they get used to now will become what they will carry with them into their future management positions.
I would suggest aseries of developmental pay scale bands, which is, I realise a complex notion.
If we want stability, what risks are we going to face?
If we want more money are we willing to face that other much starker instability if we get used to the monies associated with those comparable salaries?
If we ask what we do for society as a whole, can we answer it?
We cannot answer that we are pointless and meaningless ? can we!
The heritage arguement in the national identity debate, can only justify so much, but a salary system with greater remuneration must not be a glass floor or plank for us to blindly follow to the precipice. We need a heritage sector that can act as an experimental ground for other developing industries, that can use low investment and low returns as a basis for building business plans.
If we fear the alternatives of not working in our industry, why not make the industry into a series of models for developmental industries and other major employers so as to build a conscientious platform from a foundation of knowing whom we affect as opposed to a distanced and isolated corporate giant perspective.
I won't lie to you on this, its scary, its un-nerving but if you could take a small industry and multiply that experience into any other industry the returns and long term veiw would be considerably less confining to one destination and a reckless youth.
we could take our own futures into our own hands and take the risk.
So I ask the Digger forum what do you say of a new breed of experience and responsibility to our own destinies?
Would you risk it all in one pitch and toss of the die?
and came up with this....
However returning to the concept of minima, I think that although responsive minima is a good idea in principle, i do not see it as a longterm solution in terms of retaining regular employment.
This situation probably always will be when it comes to field staff, but what of office or senior staff with greater responsibilities, liabilities and a need for stability? The field staff of today are the management of tomorrow so what they get used to now will become what they will carry with them into their future management positions.
I would suggest aseries of developmental pay scale bands, which is, I realise a complex notion.
If we want stability, what risks are we going to face?
If we want more money are we willing to face that other much starker instability if we get used to the monies associated with those comparable salaries?
If we ask what we do for society as a whole, can we answer it?
We cannot answer that we are pointless and meaningless ? can we!
The heritage arguement in the national identity debate, can only justify so much, but a salary system with greater remuneration must not be a glass floor or plank for us to blindly follow to the precipice. We need a heritage sector that can act as an experimental ground for other developing industries, that can use low investment and low returns as a basis for building business plans.
If we fear the alternatives of not working in our industry, why not make the industry into a series of models for developmental industries and other major employers so as to build a conscientious platform from a foundation of knowing whom we affect as opposed to a distanced and isolated corporate giant perspective.
I won't lie to you on this, its scary, its un-nerving but if you could take a small industry and multiply that experience into any other industry the returns and long term veiw would be considerably less confining to one destination and a reckless youth.
we could take our own futures into our own hands and take the risk.
So I ask the Digger forum what do you say of a new breed of experience and responsibility to our own destinies?
Would you risk it all in one pitch and toss of the die?
For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he
Thomas Rainborough 1647
Thomas Rainborough 1647