1st December 2009, 05:21 PM
Mucky
is it competitive tendering or the process of competitive tendering which is wrong in your world?
Currently working out if there is anything correct with :Market forces DO NOT WORK WITHOUT A DISCERNING CONSUMER. So far drawn a blank. I am happy if half the time I over charge them.
Is there a chance that what you think archaeology is, isnt worth as much as you think it is? Around my way I would say about 80% of the archaeology is ploughed over every year and nobody bats an eyelid. Could it be that you have been mainly on sites where the Discerning Consumer was right royaly overcharged and you took itt to be the norm. Be interesting to see what they paid for.
is it competitive tendering or the process of competitive tendering which is wrong in your world?
Currently working out if there is anything correct with :Market forces DO NOT WORK WITHOUT A DISCERNING CONSUMER. So far drawn a blank. I am happy if half the time I over charge them.
Is there a chance that what you think archaeology is, isnt worth as much as you think it is? Around my way I would say about 80% of the archaeology is ploughed over every year and nobody bats an eyelid. Could it be that you have been mainly on sites where the Discerning Consumer was right royaly overcharged and you took itt to be the norm. Be interesting to see what they paid for.
Reason: your past is my past