3rd December 2009, 11:43 PM
I am quite certain that I can provide plenty of evidence that I cannot be accused of being an archaeologist.
I would refuse any offer, challenge the competence of any adjudicator who made the valuation and those who appointed them and insist that it went to market. I think the last big anglo-saxon hoard was short by a factor of ten. Mugs. Although well done the system for ripping off the landowner and the other git.
What it brings into question is the valus of "significant archaeology"-local, regional, national, international. seems to me a million should be considered local....
I would refuse any offer, challenge the competence of any adjudicator who made the valuation and those who appointed them and insist that it went to market. I think the last big anglo-saxon hoard was short by a factor of ten. Mugs. Although well done the system for ripping off the landowner and the other git.
What it brings into question is the valus of "significant archaeology"-local, regional, national, international. seems to me a million should be considered local....
Reason: your past is my past