24th March 2010, 05:30 PM
HE6.1-2 appears to require at a minimum with all planning applications a statement concerning:
assets themselves should have been assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary given the application’s impact. [/SIZE]
From the guide it appears that there needs to be a production of a written scheme prior to the determination
Is this how we do it now? Why would anybody want to pay for an agreed WSI before the application is determined?
Quote:
[SIZE=3]relevant historic environment record should have been consulted and the heritage
assets themselves should have been assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary given the application’s impact. [/SIZE]
From the guide it appears that there needs to be a production of a written scheme prior to the determination
Quote:[SIZE=3]140. To secure effective implementation after the decision is made it will be important to finalise the content of the written scheme of investigation prior to determination. This will ensure that the developer is fully aware of the extent of the commitment before implementing the consent. A condition requiring implementation of a written scheme of investigation will be effective if it can be worded in the negative i.e. that no works pursuant to the consent are to be commenced or the development beneficially occupied before a relevant part or the whole of the written scheme of investigation is carried out (a ‘condition precedent’[/SIZE]. If part of the written scheme of investigation is likely to be completed after the development it may be more appropriate to require a planning obligation under a s106 Agreement. Further general guidance on the use of conditions and planning obligations is provided by CLG.
Is this how we do it now? Why would anybody want to pay for an agreed WSI before the application is determined?