9th April 2010, 10:54 AM
Quote:
The implications of this PPS5 statement are that the application would be treated as if the site was still there so an applicant who destroyed a site prior to applying for planning permission could end up with a refusal of permission on the grounds that any permission granted would be impossible to implement because it would be impossible to discharge the archaeological condition required for permission to be granted.
what would be the archaeological condition that would be impossible to discharge?