16th April 2010, 08:07 PM
This was where BAJR came in again... it used to be IFA required... BAJR then said that IFA preffered was the maximum allowed. as it was exclusive. forcing people to join an organisation (for whatever reason) that they perhaps (for whatever reason) they did not want to.
ie. I would be unable to apply for a job, even if I was capable, as I am not in teh IfA (for whatever reason)
The point to joining comes when there isa point to joining... and like the unionisation debate... only when enough people join is there a point to joining... and so it goes round. :face-confused:
Interstingly the IfA have yet to reply to the Letter sent about unionisation. There was no requirement for a reply, only an acknowledgement. so I hope once the conference is clear, they will be able to say hello. perhaps its little things like that that matter? :face-thinks:
ie. I would be unable to apply for a job, even if I was capable, as I am not in teh IfA (for whatever reason)
The point to joining comes when there isa point to joining... and like the unionisation debate... only when enough people join is there a point to joining... and so it goes round. :face-confused:
Interstingly the IfA have yet to reply to the Letter sent about unionisation. There was no requirement for a reply, only an acknowledgement. so I hope once the conference is clear, they will be able to say hello. perhaps its little things like that that matter? :face-thinks: