21st April 2010, 12:36 PM
Steven Wrote:.... lists....can also be viewed as a way of helping to "protecting" locally based (i.e. good local knowledge) small (independent) archaeologists. It may be unfair to new companies, but is it fair, or even reasonable that say, a list in Cornwall has to have a Scottish based unit on it, when there could be very good locally based units that rely on the work to survive....
Good return to subject!
I tried to raise this back on, oh, about page 2 of this thread before the IFA-slagging kicked off, went through its tricky teenage years (again) and went of to live in its own thread elsewhere :face-approve:
Shall check out the links, although for a unit in northern England maybe not the most useful....handy examples though of transparency that should be happening everywhere :face-huh: