29th April 2010, 04:29 PM
apart from replaceing member for archaeologists (when did they do that/whoes baby was it?)
I thought I would analysis the changes to the code since 1998 as I have a paper copy locked away so that they cant change it
1 changed
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
notes changed
1.5
1.6 changed
notes removed
1.7 new
notes with new note
1.8 was 1.7
1.9 was deleted but is now what was 1.8 this is my favourite of all time
1.10
notes
1.11
1.12 changed
notes
1.13
1.14 new
2
2.1
2.2
notes
2.3
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8 new
They seem to run out of wind for change after the first principle. Either the first principle was rubbish or nobody can be bothered after trying to sort the first priciple rules out to read much further
I thought I would analysis the changes to the code since 1998 as I have a paper copy locked away so that they cant change it
1 changed
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
notes changed
1.5
1.6 changed
notes removed
1.7 new
notes with new note
1.8 was 1.7
1.9 was deleted but is now what was 1.8 this is my favourite of all time
1.10
notes
1.11
1.12 changed
notes
1.13
1.14 new
2
2.1
2.2
notes
2.3
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8 new
They seem to run out of wind for change after the first principle. Either the first principle was rubbish or nobody can be bothered after trying to sort the first priciple rules out to read much further