3rd May 2010, 04:01 PM
Odinn Wrote:I'm with BAJR on this one. I don't think they were saying that you should write the DBAs deliberately to write off the archaeology. The point being made as far as I read it was that the DBA should be a realistic assessment of the available evidence. If you start saying there is stuff there when the evidence is unclear or not there just so that you can get to do field work clients are going to get wise to you soon enough and think that you are trying to screw them. At that point all your work dries up and you have shot yourself in the foot.
INDEED THERE ARE KNOWN INSTANCES OF UNITS DOING THIS (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE !!! :o):o):o)) CLIENTS SOON REALISE THEY ARE GETTING WELL AND TRULY SCREWED !!!!!!