18th June 2008, 03:01 PM
I haven't found you obstructive.
At least with the IFA there is only one of it, unlike say, psychotherapy, which has two or three competing prefessional associations which hate each other's guts. I like the idea of an internal oversight committee, I think that when David was on the council, he mentioned an 'ethics committee'. Not sure how far down the line that proposal got.
I'm unsure whether members are any more convinced of the effectiveness of the disciplinary process than non-members. I'm sure most members have naver had contact with the process either as a participant or as a witness. As no information about cases seems to be released, how do members have any more information on which to make up their minds?
re: the pipeline thingy. Yes, I agree; up to planning officer, standards and guidance does not cover this.
At least with the IFA there is only one of it, unlike say, psychotherapy, which has two or three competing prefessional associations which hate each other's guts. I like the idea of an internal oversight committee, I think that when David was on the council, he mentioned an 'ethics committee'. Not sure how far down the line that proposal got.
I'm unsure whether members are any more convinced of the effectiveness of the disciplinary process than non-members. I'm sure most members have naver had contact with the process either as a participant or as a witness. As no information about cases seems to be released, how do members have any more information on which to make up their minds?
re: the pipeline thingy. Yes, I agree; up to planning officer, standards and guidance does not cover this.