21st May 2010, 03:37 PM
You may be discussing the effectiveness of PARIS. However, the point I was making was relevant - so I'll repeat it - that it may perhaps sink in this time.
PPS5 and it's accompanying guidance do not set out that PARIS or any other mitigation strategy are 'preferred'.
Also, planting a rose bush and other normal horticultural activity does not require specific Scheduled Monument Consent as it is covered under Class 1 consent. Have a look at the guidance.
The assertion that common sense is 'commercial' sense is pretty funny though...
Also your story (Beamo) about a site being sold 10 years later with planning permission and SMC is quite interesting when both would have expired long before the alleged 10 years had passed.... Pull the other one...
Not sure what your agenda is but you could at least stick to the plausible when you're confabulating.
Sith - the use of the term Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) in relation to schmes of Preservation in situ is surely redundant as the investigation should have already been done. Perhaps Project Design or Written Scheme of Preservation should be employed, better not to confuse the clients as to what you're up to.
Sorry, now you can get back to your anecdotes regarding permitted development etc.....
PPS5 and it's accompanying guidance do not set out that PARIS or any other mitigation strategy are 'preferred'.
Also, planting a rose bush and other normal horticultural activity does not require specific Scheduled Monument Consent as it is covered under Class 1 consent. Have a look at the guidance.
The assertion that common sense is 'commercial' sense is pretty funny though...
Also your story (Beamo) about a site being sold 10 years later with planning permission and SMC is quite interesting when both would have expired long before the alleged 10 years had passed.... Pull the other one...
Not sure what your agenda is but you could at least stick to the plausible when you're confabulating.
Sith - the use of the term Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) in relation to schmes of Preservation in situ is surely redundant as the investigation should have already been done. Perhaps Project Design or Written Scheme of Preservation should be employed, better not to confuse the clients as to what you're up to.
Sorry, now you can get back to your anecdotes regarding permitted development etc.....
[INDENT]Shiny assed county mounty, office lurker, coffee junkie and facebook scanner[/INDENT]