23rd May 2010, 08:11 PM
Good gawd... I think they may be. I read enough to see a badly researched. poorly constructed, self referencing (and throw the odd real reference in that proved nothing) a cracking piece of nonsense that also made me laugh, then see the crazy nods of frothiong agreement.
sadly, I feel there is nothing we can do to stop this other than to say... if there is an archaeologist in the UK that thinks this article is good... then please step forward now.... you are not worthy of the name.
sadly, I feel there is nothing we can do to stop this other than to say... if there is an archaeologist in the UK that thinks this article is good... then please step forward now.... you are not worthy of the name.